CEA update, Q1 2021

Contents

• Introduction

  • Background
  • Program progress
  • Expanding capacity
• Program updates

  • Groups
  • Forum/online

    • Progress
    • Metrics
  • Events

    • EA Global: Reconnect
  • Community health

    • Reactive work
    • Proactive work
  • Operations

    • Progress this quarter
    • Morale and retention
  • Appendix: Additional groups information

    • Support
    • Fellowships
    • Community Building Grants
    • Group health cases
  • Notes

Introduction

Background

Program progress

• Support

  • We had around 100 calls and 120 in-depth email / Slack exchanges with group leaders. We received positive feedback on the calls (average likelihood to recommend >9/10). We increased 1:1 support for highly-ranked university groups, and helped to seed a group at Georgetown University.
• Fellowships

  • We worked with Emma Abele (a contractor and CBG recipient) and EA groups at Oxford and Stanford to set up virtual fellowships. We also hired a contractor to provide 1:1 support for groups running fellowships.
  • The number of people attending a fellowship grew 3x quarter-on-quarter (according to our records - there may have been some underreporting last quarter. We expect there was substantial growth in any case.)
  • We’re working with Max Daniel to develop a new curriculum for the In-Depth Fellowship.
• Enhanced support

  • We’re trying out enhanced support for law students, Black and Hispanic/Latinx community members, and group organizers in areas where the movement is just beginning to grow.
• Community building grants:

  • We made several renewal grants and several new grants. We are looking to expand our capacity in this area.

• The number of hours people spent engaging with the Forum grew by 19% quarter-on-quarter, and we’re on track to exceed our target of doubling engagement time from 2020 to 2021.
• We published all content from the Introductory Fellowship¹ as a series of sequences on the Forum, which will make the Forum a better place to learn about EA.
• We’re hiring for a full-stack engineer to help us to develop features more quickly.
• We cross-posted a lot of old content (so that more high-quality content is searchable via the Forum), and began to build a wiki, in collaboration with Pablo Stafforini.

• EA Global: Reconnect was focused on building connections between existing highly-engaged community members.
• 850 people attended, and they booked about 7 meetings on average. We recorded more meetings than we did in all of 2020, though that’s partly due to a different system of measurement.

• The team made good progress on a variety of small proactive projects, and continued to do reactive work on areas like media, interpersonal situations in the community, and reducing risk in spaces and locations where EA is newly developing.

Expanding capacity

• Stable base: We now have funding, strategy, and management capacity to build on.
• Important areas: We think that EA survey data + program data suggests that we are operating in some extremely important areas (e.g. university groups, events).
• Room for growth: We’re still taking only a small fraction of the opportunities available in those areas.

• We have secured enough funding to cover our next two years of operation and expansion.
• We have moved into our new Oxford office, improved our cybersecurity, and streamlined a number of HR systems.

Program updates

Groups

• We had nearly 100 calls with groups (especially highly-ranked university groups), and received positive feedback on the calls (average likelihood to recommend >9/10).
• We helped to set up a new group at Georgetown University.
• We’re working with established groups, like Stanford and LSE, to build up capacity in less-established groups (like Chicago, UCL, Imperial).

• ~3x growth: We saw 1,082 people go through a fellowship, compared to 310 in Q4. (Some of this may be because we don’t have a full record of group-run fellowships in Q4, but there was still substantial growth.)
• In-Depth Fellowship development: Max Daniel is working with us to develop the In-Depth Fellowship.
• Virtual programs: We launched EA Virtual Programs. Over 600 participants (including 78 from highly-ranked university groups) and 100 facilitators took part.

  • The fellowships are using a well-vetted curriculum, so we think the overall experience is likely to be high-quality (we’re currently analyzing post fellowship survey results).
  • We think these programs are a scalable way to give group organizers around the world a good understanding of EA, which we hope will support high-fidelity transmission of EA ideas.
• For the first time, we had a person this quarter who was dedicated to providing 1:1 support to groups running fellowships locally.
• Note that while we provided the curriculum and general support for this work, the volunteer facilitators and fellowship organizers deserve the credit for actually carrying out the programs.

• Law: Matt Reardon, a contractor and former Harvard Law EA leader, launched a Legal Topics in Effective Altruism reading group with 59 participants and 6 facilitators as a mechanism to discover alumni and seed potential new EA law school groups.
• EA in new geographies: We connected organizers in geographic areas where EA is just beginning to grow with community members who had expertise in those areas.

• We addressed 26 group-related community health issues, including four significant cases.
• We made many renewal grants to groups, and expanded support for groups in Brown University, the University of Oxford, Sweden, and the Netherlands.

Forum/online

• We have now posted the Introductory Fellowship content as a set of sequences on the Forum; this marks the first time that the Forum has offered a reasonably comprehensive and high-quality introduction to effective altruism.
• Our total engagement time grew by 19% over last quarter. March was our best month ever in terms of views and total engagement, and the week of March 29th was our best week ever. We continue to see a trend of increased Forum activity from top thinkers and researchers in a variety of cause areas.

• We hired a contractor (Brian Tan) to encourage discussion on social media (e.g. answering introductory questions in the EA Facebook group).
• Pablo Stafforini agreed to host his in-progress EA encyclopedia as a wiki on the EA Forum.
• We have cross-posted a lot of material from other CEA projects (e.g. EA Global, EA Concepts) onto the Forum, and we are currently testing the impact on search traffic of forwarding EA Concepts visitors to those Forum articles.
• We enabled the EA Hub to share our authentication system, letting us track our impact across multiple platforms.

Events

• We sent invitations to register directly (via a shorter form) to EA organization staff and to people who had previously attended EA Global more than once.
• Group sessions

  • We ran 58 in total.
  • We introduced discussion groups where participants met in groups of 3-4 for three 18-minute blocks to discuss topics from a main session.
  • The Ambassador program has previously arranged 1:1 meetings between more senior people in a field and mentees. This time, we also introduced private mixers for Ambassadors, where they met 5-7 specifically invited attendees for a 60-minute session of speed 1:1s.
• Less, higher-quality content

  • We sharply reduced the amount of centralized content in order to focus on meetings, but we spent more time on each of the four sessions we organized. We clustered them together to make it easier for attendees to plan their weekends.
  • Speakers received professional cameras, lights, and mics to ensure consistent production quality.
  • Our sense is that the talks that we did have were a bit more interesting/high-quality than the average last year. On YouTube, the “Maintaining Motivation” session and Ezra Klein’s conversation with Rob Wiblin have both reached significantly more people than an average talk.

• Attendance: We had 851 unique logins to the event app, and 718 people scheduled at least one meeting.
• Connections: We focused on helping attendees make connections.

  • The app shows 4,300 hours of meetings, more than what we recorded across all events last year. Some of this increase happened because we asked attendees to record meetings they scheduled in other platforms (like Calendly), in addition to those scheduled via the conference app.
  • The mean survey respondent reported five new connections, which is higher than the mean for any event last year. Survey respondents were likely more engaged, so survey results probably overestimate the mean for all attendees.
• Diversity: We had a goal of introducing more community members to the work of EA leaders from underrepresented ethnic groups in EA, many of whom volunteered as presenters and ambassadors. 38% of speakers were from these groups, but we missed our target of >45% of speakers being female or non-binary.
• Other metrics:

  • Likelihood to recommend: 7.7/10 compared to an average of 8.3 last year.
  • Social media connections: The mean respondent reported gaining 3.5 new social media connections due to the event.
  • Forum engagement: 11/70 (16%) of survey respondents who had a Forum account, but hadn’t used it in the last six months, logged in again. An additional 25 attendees created accounts.

Community health

• 10 inquiries or cases regarding media stories about EA
• 5 concerns around interpersonal problems such as sexual harassment
• 28 cases where we advised on situations in early field-building (geographical areas or academic/professional fields where EA is just getting established)
• 16 other situations where we advised groups, organizations, and individuals on situations like conflicts between staff or group members, online conflicts, best practices in HR, personal or mental health problems, and improving diversity, equity, and inclusion.

• We provided support and advice to three people concerned about colleagues struggling with personal/mental health problems.
• Interpersonal problems: We reached out to a community member about concerns/rumors regarding his behavior toward women. At his request, we met with him to discuss steps he’s already taken to remedy this and continued steps to take.
• Media: A journalist at a respected outlet planned to cover an EA-related topic they were somewhat unfamiliar with. We connected them with 2 interviewees who had relevant expertise and experience working with journalists (publication pending).
• Early field-building: At the request of a community member, we coordinated advice for a very popular YouTube creator who is brand new to EA and interested in creating EA-related content. Luke Freeman of Giving What We Can is now working with the creator on ideas for high-fidelity content that would still be of interest to their broad audience.

• We completed a brand survey with Rethink Priorities to see how many US college students had heard of effective altruism and how positive or negative their impressions were. Results:

  • 10-15% of respondents had heard of EA. Awareness seemed higher among students at highly-ranked universities, but the sample size of that sub-category was very small.
  • ‘A course’ was the most common source of hearing about EA.
  • Almost every respondent who had any impression of EA had a positive impression of it.
• We provided mentorship and coaching to 2 early-career community members who have public communications experience and who are exploring doing more public comms in sensitive areas (meta EA and bio).

• We advised an EA organization that asked for guidance around better supporting their staff and recruiting a more diverse staff. We conducted interviews with three women familiar with the organization to get their advice for the organization on gender inclusion.
• Community health staff followed up with 70+ Black and Hispanic/Latinx² attendees of EA fellowships and/or the 2020 Student Summit to offer calls, information about upcoming events, or other connections in the community relevant to their interests. 15 students joined one-on-one calls and several attended the EA Fellowship Weekend.
• We co-hosted two icebreakers on peer mentorship to build connections between students in underrepresented groups. One was for Black and African students. The other was for people from underrepresented racial or ethnic backgrounds generally, co-hosted with a Fellowship Weekend organizer.
• Attendees had some similar experiences and some different bottlenecks. It may be effective to do peer mentorship events around shared minority experiences, such as first-generation college students, international students, etc.
• We advised a Black EA group organizer who is exploring thoughtful community building support for this cluster.

• We published a guide aimed at EA organizations on when mediation is or is not appropriate for problems including bullying and sexual harassment.
• Julia presented to organizers of fellowships and reading groups about handling conflicts that come up around EA’s relationships with other movements or views including social justice. Feedback indicated the material wasn’t specific enough; Julia is working on a written version that she aims to make more specific and actionable.
• Julia hosted a series of interviews at EA Global: Reconnect about factors that can alienate people from EA and how four community members stay connected.

• We want to support the community’s epistemics, to ensure that we think carefully and reason well. One way we hope to do this is to make it easier for newer community members to ask questions of more experienced members. In March, we beta-tested an ‘EA Librarian’ service on the Slack channel of the In-Depth Fellowship. People asked 16 questions, and while feedback was limited, it was quite positive (e.g. someone wrote: “I REALLY APPRECIATE THIS. It fills a crucial gap in the EA community support I have access to. Thank you!”). We hope to launch an iterated version for a larger audience in Q2.
• We provided input on the epistemics section of the In-Depth Fellowship content.

• Given the positive results from the brand survey, we aren’t planning to prioritize further brand research on US college students. However, we think an important gap exists to do more proactive communication work (such as working with orgs to develop effective communication plans about longtermist and EA ideas, and differentiating approaches for different audiences or communication channels). We may seek to hire for this role in Q2.
• We didn’t make as much progress on epistemics as we originally planned (due to planning fallacy and a large reactive caseload). In Q2, we plan to better anticipate these potential obstacles.

Operations

• We’ve nearly completed a hiring round for a finance lead, and we think we’ll be able to find a suitable candidate.

• The office space is now functional, and initial staff feedback is very positive.
• Our dashboard is displaying real-time metrics from across the organization.
• We’re close to finalizing the cost allocation (this is complex due to the number of organizations involved).

• We’re aiming to integrate data from different programs, to allow us to do more personalized outreach, and to help us to assess our impact.
• We have determined the scope of this project after extensive internal stakeholder engagement.
• We plan to test this with two EA university groups in Q2.

• We revised our staff handbook and supporting policies, simplifying them.
• We revised contracts and NDAs.
• We developed an internal wiki for CEA staff.
• We completed a data mapping exercise and began a data audit.

• We completed our US audit efficiently without any apparent issues, awaiting report.
• We completed benchmarking research for executive compensation.

Appendix: Additional groups information

• We had nearly 100 calls with groups, and about 120 significant email/Slack exchanges. We received positive feedback on the calls (average likelihood to recommend >9/10).

  • This included 37 calls with leaders at highly-ranked universities.
• At EA Global: Reconnect, we ran a workshop for group organizers which approximately 75 organizers attended, and which was highly rated. We also assisted in 1:1 connections and icebreakers for the organizers.
• Examples of group plans that probably wouldn’t have happened without our support:

  • EA London School of Economics is planning to run a summer fellowship with the aim of finding future group leaders at LSE, Imperial College London, University College London, and King’s College London.
  • EA Columbia identified a new group leader, and is organizing an additional Introductory Fellowship over the summer, which it wasn’t planning to do before.
  • We encouraged the registration of EA groups at Stanford Law and Yale Law.

• Career resources: We tested a career workshop with 4 highly-ranked university groups. The workshop was rated 8/10 for its usefulness in helping participants improve their existing plans.
• In-Depth Fellowship: We partnered with Max Daniel (FHI) to develop updates to the In-Depth Fellowship curriculum (to be piloted next quarter).
• Student projects: We provided funding to EA Brown and EA Harvard to run an intercollegiate projects program, SHIPs (Student-led High-Impact Projects), which has 30 students taking part.³

  • Examples of projects students are working on include: a career guide on ending factory farming, a biosecurity infographics Instagram, and a post titled “Why is society concerned so much by illness and not, commensurately, by health?”
• Group model write-ups: James Aung coordinated organizers at CBG-funded university groups (Oxford, Cambridge, Harvard, Yale, Stanford, and Brown) to write up documents explaining how their groups work.⁴

• We worked with Yale EA to run a virtual Introductory Fellowship at Georgetown - one of the most important universities without any EA group. We sourced potential leads from local community members, 80,000 Hours, and CEA’s internal records. A professor we reached out to advertised it to his class, which resulted in around 5 new signups right before the deadline. 15 students at Georgetown are participating, and 10 have expressed interest in helping to grow the group, including the former student body president. 3 Introductory Fellowship participants have expressed interest in leading the group.
• We are now exploring using Stanford’s remote Introductory Fellowship to add capacity to groups at LSE, UCL, Imperial, and Chicago.

• In addition, many EA university groups run Introductory Fellowships for students at their own universities. The number of groups running and adopting these fellowships has doubled (from 17 groups in Q4 to 35 groups in Q1).⁵
• We had informal chats with leaders running In-Depth Fellowships, which right now are operating fairly autonomously. We think most of our value add so far is providing input on various updates proposed by group leaders and Max Daniel (who is in the process of producing a new curriculum).
• Marie Davidsen Buhl joined as a contractor to provide advice to groups running Introductory Fellowships. In Q1, she provided 1:1 support to 15 groups.⁶

  • This has allowed us to understand which resources are missing; we aim to spend more time filling these gaps next quarter (e.g. creating advertising materials and written guides for facilitators).
• We think most of the growth above is ‘organic / leader-driven’ growth, and most of our value in this space has come from improving the quality of the fellowships, rather than recruiting participants.

• EA Sweden, 2 FTE for 1 year (an increase of 0.7 FTE)
• EA Norway, 2 FTE for 1 year
• EA London, 1 FTE for 1 year
• EA France, 1.2 FTE for 1 year

• EA Netherlands, 0.8 FTE for 1 year
• EA Oxford, 1.9 FTE for 1 year
• EA Brown, 0.5 FTE for 3.5 months (spring term)⁷
• EA Germany, 1 FTE for 1 year

• 11 organizers who needed to develop greater skills or knowledge before successfully running a group
• 9 potentially reckless early field-building activities
• 7 conflicts between members of a group
• A few situations involving organizers with personal difficulties

Notes